WEEK 7 SIT 'EM: THE NAYS (WHERE WE'RE CALLING OUT THE CONSENSUS)

RB SAQUON BARKLEY (PHILADELPHIA) VS. MINNESOTA

Expert Consensus: RB9
Our Rank: RB23
Projected Points: 12.68
The Gap: 14 spots (YIKES)

This is going to hurt. Saquon Barkley is not having a good year.

I know, I know. You drafted him in the second or third round. You watched his highlights from last year. You believed the narrative about him in a better offense with better blocking and a better quarterback. You thought this was going to be the year he finally lived up to his potential.

It's not.

The numbers don't lie: Barkley is 30th among qualified running backs in yards per carry. Thirtieth. That's not "struggling." That's "replacement level."

"But he's getting volume!" you say. "Volume is king!"

Not anymore. Barkley had at least 18 carries in each of his first four games. Over his last two? He has 18 combined. The volume is evaporating. Whether the Eagles are trying to keep him fresh, fix their struggling offense, or just trying something – anything – different, Barkley's workload is declining.

"But he's catching passes!" you protest.

Sure. He's averaging 22.8 receiving yards per game. That's 14th among running backs. Christian McCaffrey – another RB struggling on the ground – is averaging 74.0 receiving yards per game. CMC is making up for his rushing struggles with elite pass-catching work. Barkley isn't.

The Minnesota Vikings defense hasn't been great against the run, but they've been solid – about the same level as the Cowboys (where Barkley averaged 3.3 YPC) or the Giants (where he managed just 67 scrimmage yards last week).

The Verdict: You're probably still starting Barkley because of his draft capital and name value. I get it. Benching a third-round pick in Week 7 feels wrong. But the experts ranking him as RB9 are living in August. Our model sees him as a backend RB2 at best.

If you have a better option – and you might – seriously consider it.

Reality Check: Barkley finishes with 60 total yards and no touchdowns. You'll be disappointed. Again.

WR JAMESON WILLIAMS (DETROIT) VS. TAMPA BAY

Expert Consensus: WR31
Our Rank: WR41
Projected Points: 9.59
The Gap: 10 spots

Jameson Williams is boom-or-bust personified. Last week? Boom – six catches, 66 yards, a touchdown. Fantasy managers everywhere are adding him to their lineups this week, expecting another explosion.

Tread. Lightly.

Williams has two weeks all season with more than 45 receiving yards. Two. He has two receiving touchdowns all year. The boom weeks are rare. The bust weeks are common.

But here's where it gets fascinating: Williams performs dramatically differently based on opponent.

If you divide his season into games against the top-3 pass defenses (Bears, Browns, Chiefs) versus games against the bottom-3 pass defenses (Bengals, Packers, Ravens), something weird happens:

Against easy defenses: 25.0 yards per game
Against tough defenses: 71.3 yards per game

Why? The Lions use Williams differently based on game script.

When passing is easy, they get the ball quickly to Amon-Ra St. Brown. Why take deep shots when you can dink-and-dunk all day? When passing is hard, they need Williams' speed to create explosive plays. The rest of the time, he's blocking.

Tampa Bay's pass defense has been below average this year, suggesting the Lions won't need big plays from Williams. They'll feed St. Brown, pound the rock with Jahmyr Gibbs, and use Williams as a decoy.

The Verdict: There's always a risk Williams goes off on your bench. That's the boom-or-bust life. But the data suggests he's better left there this week. The experts see him as a WR3/flex. Our model sees him as barely startable.

Don't chase last week's production.

Reality Check: Williams catches 2 balls for 23 yards. You'll be glad he was on your bench.

TE HAROLD FANNIN JR. (CLEVELAND) VS. MIAMI

Expert Consensus: TE11
Our Rank: TE24
Projected Points: 6.83
The Gap: 13 spots (MASSIVE)

Let me tell you about recency bias in fantasy football.

Harold Fannin Jr. was struggling. From Weeks 3-5, he averaged just three catches and 20.67 yards per game. He was droppable in most leagues. Then Week 6 happened: seven catches for 81 yards. Suddenly, he's TE11 in the expert rankings.

Don't fall for it.

Look at Fannin's two good games this season – Week 1 and Week 6. What do they have in common?

Massive pass volume. In Week 1, Joe Flacco had 45 pass attempts. Last week, Dillon Gabriel had 52 attempts. When the Browns are forced to throw 50+ times, Fannin gets his.

But that game script is unlikely against Miami. The Browns will lean on Quinshon Judkins and the run game. Tight ends will be blocking more than catching. The weather forecast doesn't look great for the passing attack either.

The experts see Fannin as a top-12 streaming option after last week's explosion. Our model sees him as a desperation play – someone you only start if literally every other tight end is injured or on bye.

The Verdict: Pivot to a different streaming tight end this week. Zach Ertz (as mentioned above) is available in most leagues and has a much better setup. Don't chase last week's volume spike.

Reality Check: Fannin catches 3 balls for 28 yards. You'll wish you'd streamed someone else.

THE DEEPER DIVE: WHY THESE GAPS MATTER

Fantasy football in 2025 is different than it's ever been. The gap between the best teams and the worst teams is smaller. The gap between the best players and replacement-level players is narrower. And the margins – the tiny edges that separate winners from losers – are everything.

When our projection model sees Daniel Jones as QB2 while experts have him at QB12, that's not just a disagreement. That's a fundamental difference in evaluation. The experts are looking at his career, his reputation, his draft position. Our model is looking at his current role, his rushing upside, his matchup, and his recent performance.

One of these approaches is stuck in the past. The other is focused on the present and future.

When the model ranks Saquon Barkley as RB23 while experts have him at RB9, that's not disrespect. That's data refusing to lie. The experts are anchored to his draft position, his name value, his reputation. Our model sees declining volume, poor efficiency, and a lack of receiving work to compensate.

One of these approaches is based on hope. The other is based on reality.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF START/SIT DECISIONS

Here's the thing nobody talks about: starting the wrong player feels worse than benching the right player.

If you bench Saquon Barkley and he scores 25 points, you'll be annoyed. But if you start him and he scores 6 points while your bench player scores 20? You'll be furious. That's the difference between "bad luck" and "bad decision-making."

The same logic applies in reverse. If you start Daniel Jones and he flops, you can say "the data supported it, sometimes variance happens." If you don't start him and he goes off? You'll wonder why you even bothered looking at projections.

This is why edges matter. When our model and the experts disagree dramatically, one side is going to be very right and the other side is going to be very wrong. The question is: which side do you want to be on?

THE WEEK 7 GAMEPLAN: PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

If you're reading this far, you're either:

Seriously committed to winning your league
Procrastinating at work
Both

Either way, here's your Week 7 action plan:

MUST-START UPGRADES:

Daniel Jones over whoever you think is "safer" (yes, even Dak Prescott)
Rachaad White as a top-7 RB with confidence
Romeo Doubs as a WR2 play, not a desperation flex
Zach Ertz as a streaming tight end with real upside

MUST-BENCH DOWNGRADES:

Saquon Barkley unless you literally have no other options (and maybe even then)
Jameson Williams back to the bench after last week's boom
Harold Fannin Jr. – don't chase last week's volume spike

THE BIGGER PICTURE: We're one-third through the season. Draft capital doesn't matter anymore. Name value doesn't matter. What matters is current role, current performance, and current opportunity.

The players who will win you championships in Weeks 15-17 aren't necessarily the ones you drafted in Rounds 1-5. They're the ones you're smart enough to start in Week 7, Week 8, Week 9 – while everyone else is still chasing August expectations.

FINAL THOUGHTS: TRUST THE DATA, NOT THE NARRATIVES

Fantasy football is a game of incomplete information, cognitive biases, and confirmation bias. The experts are human. They make mistakes. They overvalue names. They're slow to adjust. They care about their reputation more than they care about being right.

Our projection model doesn't have any of those problems. It doesn't care that Saquon Barkley was a top-10 pick. It doesn't care that Daniel Jones used to be a meme. It doesn't care about narratives, storylines, or hot takes.

It cares about opportunity, efficiency, matchups, and probability. And this week, it's screaming:

Start Daniel Jones (the experts are 10 spots too low)
Start Rachaad White (the experts are 7 spots too low)
Sit Saquon Barkley (the experts are 14 spots too high)
Sit Jameson Williams (the experts are 10 spots too high)

Will the model be perfect? Of course not. No model is. But over the course of a season, consistently exploiting these gaps – starting players the consensus is too low on, benching players the consensus is too high on – creates a mathematical edge that translates directly into wins.

And in fantasy football, wins are all that matter.

So this week, when you're staring at your lineup on Sunday morning, deciding whether to trust the experts or trust the data, remember this: the experts are betting on who they think players are. The data is betting on who players actually are.

Choose wisely. Your playoff hopes depend on it.

For more fantasy football insights, waiver wire targets, and data-driven analysis, check out our complete Week 7 coverage. And remember: the best time to fix your roster was last week. The second-best time is right now.

We thank Stats Perform for providing the data

Photo:

More information:24live.com

24live.com