Historic Finals: Small markets write big NBA story

← Back

 

After nineteen years, the basketball world witnessed a unique moment - an NBA Finals without a single large market. The Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers, two teams that have never won a title in their current cities, will clash in a David versus Goliath battle. Paradoxically, however, the Thunder with their 68 regular season wins play the role of Goliath this time.

The Thunder with sixty-eight wins recorded the third-best regular season in NBA history, making them massive favorites with -700 odds for overall victory. The Pacers, conversely, held a 9-14 record in January and their presence in the Finals borders on miraculous. The eighteen-win difference between teams is the largest since 1981.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the Thunder to a dominant season averaging 32.7 points per game, earning him regular season MVP. If the Thunder win the title, he would break Jordan's 1993 record as the player with the highest scoring average for a champion. Thunder's playoff dominance is overwhelming - they won games by 51, 43, 32, 26, and 30 points.

Against Eastern Conference teams, Oklahoma City has an almost perfect 29-1 record, with the only loss coming against Cleveland. The Thunder also represent the youngest finalist since the Portland Trail Blazers in 1977, suggesting potential for a long-term dynasty.

The Indiana Pacers, however, demonstrated incredible mental strength with four comebacks of seventeen or more points in the playoffs, a record since 1997. They defeated the sixty-four-win Cleveland in the second round and could become the first team to beat two sixty-four-plus win teams in one playoff run.

Tyrese Haliburton has +700 odds for Finals MVP, reflecting belief in his ability to decide the series. The Pacers as the only Eastern team had a positive record against the West at 21-10, indicating their ability to compete with the league's best teams.

Rick Carlisle as Pacers coach has a reputation as a playoff wizard who can identify opponent weaknesses and adapt tactics. Pascal Siakam presents a potential mismatch problem for Thunder defense due to his versatility and championship experience with Toronto.

The Thunder enter the series with home-court advantage and playoff experience where they haven't lost more than one game in a series yet. Their basketball based on speed and youthful energy proved devastating against all Eastern opponents.

However, the Pacers have nothing to lose. Everyone expects Thunder victory, which could create the perfect environment for more comeback specialists from Indianapolis. Their young core gained valuable playoff experience and proved they can play under pressure.

Historical context favors the Thunder. Since 1980, every champion had at least fifty-two wins and was seeded in the top three of their conference, which the Pacers don't meet. Since the pandemic, however, we see an average of six upsets annually compared to the historical three to four.

If the Pacers won, they would break regular season logic forever and prove that everything can be different in the playoffs. The first Finals without a luxury tax team since 2002 also suggests a paradigm shift in the NBA toward smaller markets.

Game 1 Thursday night will be crucial for setting the series tempo. The Thunder are 9.5-point favorites, which might be too large a spread against a team with proven comeback abilities. The high tempo of both teams suggests the possibility of exceeding the 231-point total.

The series promises basketball history regardless of the outcome. Either the Thunder complete one of the most dominant seasons in NBA history, or the Pacers write one of the greatest upset stories of the modern era. Small markets are finally getting their moment of glory on basketball's biggest stage.